gave me the impression one has tried to tell the story with an epic touch that has been marred by the harshness, very of the time, present throughout the movie macula.
had placed high expectations on this film and the less I have to say that I have been pleasantly surprised by two things:
1) Not Gladiator (no harangues super shocked, shocked or sound track, although large scenes action ó n).
2) It is not far from the Robin Hood of Kevin Reynolds, with Kevin Costner
The diffuse and obscure origins of Robin Hood (surnamed according to tradition or Loxley Longstride) give a lot of play. In the film, Ridley Scott, though deprived of their legitimate hero origins of noble blood (but rather some cleared by a post traumatic stress), is given a noble personality as tradition dictates. And that's something I miss in the film. No Robin Hood is the man, always perfect is an iconic figure that no one dares tohumanize too, only alluded to feelings, painful past, which makes Robin empathy grows among viewers ( poor, his father left for pequeñoy yet look how ; good has come ). The only thing that shows you have blood in your veins is that it looks at once Marian ass without knowing anything (other glances assume it's because something is cooked).
We later learned that his father left him, but he was killed (in front of him, hence the post traumatic stress) to have ideas too revolutionary. His father was avisionary, see what happens.
The film, in short, a lot of politicking of the good (the rough and transformations of English royalty and mamoneos with the French crown) and he paints in the middle Longstride Robin (adoption Loxley) , a humble, honest, handsome, sincere and charismatic ( blah, blah, blah ) archer army of Richard I of England Lionheart.
could say that this adaptation is the least faithful to the legend of Robin Hood, where for example, Little John and Robin are known in the field of battle and fight over a bet Fist. It is a versionRobin first, courtesy, send it to shit the field, but seeing that the man is dying and gives you access penilla. Despite having spent the entire roll of King Richard, who reproaches that the crusade is shit on a stick, now suddenly becomes super good, wears the crown to London by posing as Robert Loxley and then travel to Nottingham to return the sword to the father of Robert, who is blind. There the father asks him to pretend to be his son, Marian complain and disagree but spend their opinion therein lies the stone and sexual tension. After several good deeds by Marian Robin that make itttle John. · crudeness of scenes, and I do not mean just the battle give realism to the story. · The battle scenes, especially the sample of strategies. When the French start throwing stones (15 miles from the soldiers at least, is, that the pa ná
throw) reminded me
Monty The square. Things
reguleras
: • The soundtrack, half and half. · The carefree moments of the film, a movie being so serious, remain rare.
· How to have passed through the stone Juan
kidnapped his second wife on the day of her wedding with a French Lord, like most normal thing in the world ignore that. • The Papacy resolution annulling the first marriage of John I of England, is conspicuous by its absence. Reference is made to: never go to grant the annulment, but in a magical moment of the film imperceptible to the viewer, the annulment is granted.
• The scene of the voyage from France to England, at times we notice that the boat is not glue, goop is total. Bad things
:
• That are mounted on a boat, put to get drunk, sing and no one pot, with menrettes, with a kick to break the doors of a castle, WTF!
• The foil horse issued by a valley (beautiful by the way), WTF!
· The masks for children, a chilling replica of the Scarecrow mask from Batman esparto, WTF!
• The death of Ricardo. Srsly, writers!? Richard Coeur de Lion killed by an arrow in the neck launched by a chef in a nightdress?! SRSLY?! WTF!
• In full battle Châlus assault on the castle, France, cooks up the tower archers to bring soup to eat, WTF.
• The "troops" of Marian in the ba